Was this a disguise intended to obscure the presence of ongoing maintenance? Or perhaps an aesthetic treatment to "improve" the appearance of the scaffolding?
This reminded me of the seemingly common occurrence of traveling to visit some architectural monument, only to discover the site to be in a state of restoration, forever coupling the visitor's experience with a temporary, yet radically altered, state.
[Image: courtesy of C. Chase Taylor]
[Image: courtesy of Iian Simpson]
Perhaps the world needs a Google Maps layer of Monument Maintenance, identifying in real time the destinations that are currently obscured to warn travelers.
Alternatively, perhaps scaffolding installations should be temporary art installations, blurring the boundaries of temporary and permanent monumentality.
Or perhaps the logical conclusion is to obscure the monument with an image of the monument itself, providing a surrogate experience of the real with an image of the real.
[Image: courtesy of Elliot Brown]
[Image: courtesy of assortedstuff]
Which begs the question, should the surrogate image represent the "before," the "after" or another state altogether?
Post a Comment